PEER-REVIEW PROCEDURE

Industria Textila journal publishes original reviewed experimental and theoretical research papers, short comments, book reviews, papers presented at national and international scientific conferences that are not published in the proceedings and advertising. The topics cover issues related to the textile and clothing industry, as follows: raw materials, spinning, weaving, knitting, chemical technology, clothing and related fields: laboratory apparatus and equipment for mechanical and chemical processing, chemicals and auxiliaries, computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing, management and marketing systems.
Manuscripts are received from industrial laboratories, research institutes and centers, universities, private research organizations, and independent scientists.
Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all coauthors, if any.
Industria Textila journal follows the traditional and is the most common method of reviewing Double Blind Peer Review: the authors do not know who the reviewers are and the reviewers do not know who the authors are.
The main steps of the peer-review process are the following:
• Paper submission
The corresponding or submitting author submits the electronic format of the manuscripts by using journal’s submission site manuscriptmanager.net/it or using the button Submit manuscript on the journal website www.revistaindustriatextila.ro, following the guidelines.
• Paper registration
The submission system generates a registration number for each submitted paper and sends to corresponding author(s) a confirmation email - with all info necessary for online tracking status of the paper.
• Anti-plagiarism check
A verification of the paper is made by the Editor-in-Chief regarding the fulfilment of the similarity criterion using anti-plagiarism software.
• Editor-in-Chief's evaluation
The Editor-in-Chief performs the first evaluation of the paper regarding the alignment to the purpose of the journal and the fulfilment of the template requirements: presentation, length, structure, style, composition.
• Reviewer invitation
If the paper meets the quality conditions, the Editorial board selects minimum two qualified reviewers, renowned scientist and considered expert in the subject the article concerns, whose names are not disclosed without their consent, for each submitted manuscript.
• Reviewer's evaluation
The review process is based on an evaluation form which assesses the scientific and technical standard of the manuscripts. The manuscript will be accepted for publication provided reviews are favourable. In case of diversified opinions of the reviewers, the Editorial board will make the final decision. If not accepted for publication, the manuscripts and the figures will not normally be returned. The authors will be notified as soon as possible on the result of manuscript evaluation (to be published, to be modified, rejected).
• Editor-in-Chief's decision
The Editor-in-Chief sends a final decision email to the corresponding or submitting author.
- If Revisions are required, authors have to submit revised Paper for further reviews.
- If the Paper is accepted, it is processed and the article proof is sent to the corresponding or submitting author before it is made into pages for final production. The checked article proof should be returned as soon as possible.
• Publication
1. Generate the DOI code
2. Adapting the final version of the paper according with journal's publishing template
3. Archive the final version of the paper in the journal's database
4. Online and physical publication

© Copyright 2020 INCDTP